Fronset Benchmark

Moonshot Kimi K3 at a glance

Good enough on 37/54 tasks at the Balanced step. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Structured Data & Fact Extraction, Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Relevance, Cl

Provider
Moonshot AI
Model name
kimi-k3
What the steps mean
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
37 / 54 tasks (at the Balanced step)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Profiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 8.12, 66.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAtomic Fact Claim Extraction — quality 7.63, 87.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.78, 85.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.82, 35.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.37, 330.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.82, 111.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.00, 5.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Campaign Generation — quality 7.78, 361.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.84, 172.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Response Generation — quality 8.41, 191.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.87, 268.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.62, 162.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 8.11, 65.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Outline Generation — quality 9.43, 14.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Region Identification — quality 8.82, 3.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.65, 103.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionModel Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.38, 64.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 8.14, 70.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 7.76, 7.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.69, 75.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.91, 78.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionClaim Continuity Classification — quality 8.67, 162.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 9.20, 65.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.96, 210.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 7.98, 37.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionShort Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 6.80, 71.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.79, 99.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.95, 121.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Section Taxonomy Generation — quality 9.16, 2.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Content Promotion Generation — quality 7.99, 7.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.54, 95.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 9.23, 93.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Taxonomy Matching — quality 8.26, 9.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.77, 16.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 9.08, 18.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSection Prompt Generation — quality 8.67, 53.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Output Extraction — quality 9.59, 111.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the Balanced step are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Publication Section Taxonomy Generation bestLong-form Content Generation100%RANKED2.7x
Research Region Identification bestStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%HIGH3.5x
Authoritative Source SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching92%MEDIUM5.5x
Community Content Promotion GenerationSocial & Promotional Content91%HIGH7.6x
Thematic Topic DiscoveryTopic Organization & Clustering94%MEDIUM7.7x
Topic Taxonomy MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching97%MEDIUM9.2x
Report Outline Generation bestLong-form Content Generation100%RANKED14x
Bench Article Hypothesis Generation bestEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation100%RANKED16x
Reference Preserving Analytical WritingLong-form Content Generation97%RANKED19x
Multi Perspective Decision Synthesis bestFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions100%RANKED35x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis93%HIGH38x
Section Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility95%MEDIUM54x
Model Specific Prompt AdaptationInfrastructure & Utility94%MEDIUM64x
Persona Policy Eligibility Check bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH65x
Catalyst And Scenario AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions92%MEDIUM66x
Profiled Document Structure ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction91%MEDIUM67x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis95%MEDIUM70x
Short Post Batch Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching91%MEDIUM72x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis98%HIGH76x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions91%RANKED79x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility99%HIGH86x
Atomic Fact Claim ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction99%MEDIUM87x
Batch Text Translation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%RANKED93x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content98%RANKED95x
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions96%MEDIUM99x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility97%RANKED104x
Bench Hypothesis Post Generation bestSocial & Promotional Content100%HIGH111x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction97%HIGH112x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching100%RANKED121x
Claim Continuity ClassificationRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH162x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching99%HIGH162x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH172x
Public Response GenerationSocial & Promotional Content99%RANKED192x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis98%RANKED210x
Topic Cluster Labeling bestTopic Organization & Clustering100%RANKED268x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering94%MEDIUM331x
Promotional Campaign GenerationSocial & Promotional Content97%HIGH361x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that meets the quality step on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.