Fronset Benchmark

Meta Muse Spark 1.3 at a glance

Good enough on 37/54 tasks at the Balanced step. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Relevance, Classification & Matching, Content Su

Provider
OpenRouter
Model name
meta/muse-spark-1.3
What the steps mean
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
37 / 54 tasks (at the Balanced step)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Factual Claim Refinement — quality 8.43, 24.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 8.89, 27.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.53, 31.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.07, 12.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.62, 103.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.06, 64.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.67, 34.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.26, 1.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.30, 132.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.17, 120.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.69, 61.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 7.50, 32.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 7.93, 14.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent Set Relevance Scoring — quality 6.70, 11.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfile Pool Matching — quality 8.49, 39.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.17, 56.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionModel Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.64, 19.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.58, 16.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 7.98, 11.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVisual Theme Configuration Generation — quality 8.64, 21.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 7.64, 2.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.89, 40.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.86, 28.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionClaim Continuity Classification — quality 8.23, 27.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 8.84, 30.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.52, 41.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 7.94, 15.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionShort Post Batch Relevance Scoring — quality 7.00, 25.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.75, 14.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.78, 133.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Validation — quality 8.66, 76.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.03, 41.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.92, 19.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Taxonomy Matching — quality 7.77, 2.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.67, 3.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSection Prompt Generation — quality 8.58, 14.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Community Selection — quality 7.86, 5.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the Balanced step are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Authoritative Source SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching95%RANKED1.7x
Topic Taxonomy MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching91%MEDIUM2.4x
Thematic Topic DiscoveryTopic Organization & Clustering93%MEDIUM2.5x
Bench Article Hypothesis GenerationEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation99%RANKED3.2x
Research Community Selection bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%HIGH5.4x
Content Set Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM11x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis94%HIGH11x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions91%RANKED13x
Catalyst And Scenario AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions90%HIGH14x
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions95%HIGH14x
Section Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility94%MEDIUM15x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis92%MEDIUM16x
Voice Profile Generation bestLong-form Content Generation100%HIGH17x
Model Specific Prompt AdaptationInfrastructure & Utility97%HIGH20x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility97%RANKED20x
Visual Theme Configuration GenerationLong-form Content Generation98%MEDIUM21x
Factual Claim RefinementInfrastructure & Utility98%MEDIUM24x
Short Post Batch Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM25x
Profiled Document Structure Extraction bestStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%HIGH27x
Claim Continuity ClassificationRelevance, Classification & Matching95%RANKED27x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions90%HIGH29x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching96%HIGH30x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility96%HIGH31x
Topic Section AssignmentTopic Organization & Clustering91%MEDIUM32x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content98%RANKED34x
Profile Pool MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching97%MEDIUM40x
Structured Content Summarization bestContent Summarization & Synthesis100%RANKED41x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis93%RANKED41x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content92%MEDIUM41x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility91%HIGH57x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching100%RANKED62x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering91%HIGH64x
Research Query Validation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%HIGH76x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility91%MEDIUM103x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering92%HIGH120x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM132x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED133x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that meets the quality step on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.