Fronset Benchmark

GPT-6 Luna at a glance

Good enough on 26/54 tasks at the Balanced step. Best value on 13 tasks. Best fit for: Infrastructure & Utility, Content Summarization & Synthesis.

Provider
OpenAI
Model name
gpt-6-luna
What the steps mean
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
26 / 54 tasks (at the Balanced step)
Best value on
13 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Factual Claim Refinement — quality 8.43, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Atomic Fact Claim Extraction — quality 7.70, 1.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.09, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Metadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.85, 2.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.46, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Engagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.08, 2.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.40, 4.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.55, 1.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 8.63, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Profile Pool Matching — quality 8.22, 1.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.79, 1.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionModel Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.59, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Voice Profile Generation — quality 8.91, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Evidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 7.96, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Visual Theme Configuration Generation — quality 8.57, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Structured Content Summarization — quality 8.46, 1.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 9.48, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Claim Continuity Classification — quality 8.04, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Publication Title Package Generation — quality 8.78, 2.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 8.11, 1.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.85, 2.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionGenerated Content Relevance Scoring — quality 8.13, 3.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 7.85, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Batch Text Translation — quality 8.72, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Section Prompt Generation — quality 8.48, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Structured Output Extraction — quality 9.11, 2.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the Balanced step are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Section Prompt Generation ★Infrastructure & Utility93%MEDIUMbest value
Batch Text Translation ★Infrastructure & Utility94%HIGHbest value
Evidence Grounded Claim Generation ★Content Summarization & Synthesis93%MEDIUMbest value
Visual Theme Configuration Generation ★Long-form Content Generation97%RANKEDbest value
Model Specific Prompt Adaptation ★Infrastructure & Utility97%MEDIUMbest value
Factual Claim Refinement ★Infrastructure & Utility98%HIGHbest value
Voice Profile Generation ★Long-form Content Generation93%HIGHbest value
Promotional Message Generation ★Social & Promotional Content90%HIGHbest value
Claim Continuity Classification ★Relevance, Classification & Matching93%RANKEDbest value
Profiled Document Section Analysis ★Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions97%HIGHbest value
Research Query Generation ★Infrastructure & Utility90%HIGHbest value
Catalyst And Scenario Analysis ★Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions98%MEDIUMbest value
Bench Hypothesis Post Generation ★Social & Promotional Content96%RANKEDbest value
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis94%HIGH1.1x
Atomic Fact Claim Extraction bestStructured Data & Fact Extraction100%RANKED1.2x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching98%HIGH1.4x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis95%HIGH1.6x
Profile Pool MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM1.7x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility98%RANKED1.9x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching91%MEDIUM2.3x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility94%RANKED2.5x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis96%MEDIUM2.5x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction92%HIGH2.6x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching98%RANKED2.9x
Generated Content Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching93%MEDIUM3.4x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering95%HIGH4.3x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that meets the quality step on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.