Fronset Benchmark

Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro at a glance

Good enough on 21/54 tasks at the Balanced step. Best value on 3 tasks. Best fit for: Infrastructure & Utility, Social & Promotional Content, Content Summarization & Synthesis.

Provider
Xiaomi MiMo
Model name
mimo-v2.6-pro
What the steps mean
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
21 / 54 tasks (at the Balanced step)
Best value on
3 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Factual Claim Refinement — quality 7.98, 1.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAtomic Fact Claim Extraction — quality 7.18, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Research Query Generation — quality 7.51, 1.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 7.95, 1.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.93, 4.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.42, 4.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCapability Category Matching — quality 8.86, 2.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.71, 5.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Response Generation — quality 8.48, 3.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.41, 2.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent Set Relevance Scoring — quality 6.61, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Evidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 7.92, 1.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 8.75, 1.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.41, 2.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 8.07, 1.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.88, 7.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionGenerated Content Relevance Scoring — quality 8.36, 3.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.10, 1.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.93, 1.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 8.52, this model IS the best-value good-enough option★Structured Output Extraction — quality 9.64, 3.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the Balanced step are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Atomic Fact Claim Extraction ★Structured Data & Fact Extraction93%HIGHbest value
Content Set Relevance Scoring ★Relevance, Classification & Matching97%MEDIUMbest value
Reference Preserving Analytical Writing ★Long-form Content Generation91%MEDIUMbest value
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility95%HIGH1.3x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching95%MEDIUM1.4x
Factual Claim RefinementInfrastructure & Utility92%MEDIUM1.4x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions90%MEDIUM1.6x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility97%HIGH1.7x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content93%HIGH1.7x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis93%HIGH1.9x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis94%HIGH1.9x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis92%MEDIUM2.5x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching96%HIGH2.8x
Capability Category MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM2.9x
Structured Output ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction97%HIGH3x
Generated Content Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching96%MEDIUM3.2x
Public Response Generation bestSocial & Promotional Content100%MEDIUM3.9x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility95%RANKED4x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering95%HIGH4.5x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM5x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED7.8x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that meets the quality step on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.