Fronset Benchmark

Tencent Hy4 Preview at a glance

Good enough on 26/54 tasks at the Balanced step. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Long-form Content Generation, Relevance, Classif

Provider
OpenRouter
Model name
tencent/hy4-preview
What the steps mean
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
26 / 54 tasks (at the Balanced step)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%78910Quality score (7–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Factual Claim Refinement — quality 8.06, 56.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Structure Extraction — quality 8.62, 72.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Query Generation — quality 7.34, 60.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.29, 11.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.36, 132.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.13, 2.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.64, 168.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Section Assignment — quality 7.47, 72.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfile Pool Matching — quality 8.71, 49.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.56, 115.2x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionModel Specific Prompt Adaptation — quality 8.89, 49.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.47, 47.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 7.95, 21.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVisual Theme Configuration Generation — quality 8.70, 44.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionThematic Topic Discovery — quality 7.88, 2.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.66, 73.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 8.96, 41.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 8.98, 84.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 8.72, 113.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 7.87, 17.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 8.91, 41.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.81, 92.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Engagement Reply Review — quality 8.42, 4.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.29, 135.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Article Hypothesis Generation — quality 8.58, 10.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSection Prompt Generation — quality 8.74, 34.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the Balanced step are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Authoritative Source SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM2.3x
Thematic Topic DiscoveryTopic Organization & Clustering96%MEDIUM2.4x
Public Engagement Reply ReviewRelevance, Classification & Matching94%MEDIUM4.9x
Bench Article Hypothesis GenerationEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation98%RANKED10x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions94%HIGH12x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis91%MEDIUM17x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis93%MEDIUM22x
Section Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility96%HIGH34x
Profiled Document Section AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions91%HIGH41x
Profiled Document AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions97%HIGH42x
Visual Theme Configuration GenerationLong-form Content Generation99%MEDIUM44x
Voice Profile GenerationLong-form Content Generation99%RANKED47x
Profile Pool Matching bestRelevance, Classification & Matching100%MEDIUM49x
Model Specific Prompt Adaptation bestInfrastructure & Utility100%MEDIUM49x
Factual Claim RefinementInfrastructure & Utility93%MEDIUM57x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility93%HIGH60x
Topic Section AssignmentTopic Organization & Clustering91%MEDIUM72x
Profiled Document Structure ExtractionStructured Data & Fact Extraction97%MEDIUM73x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis97%HIGH74x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM85x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching98%HIGH93x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis95%RANKED113x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility96%HIGH115x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content95%HIGH132x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content95%HIGH136x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching99%RANKED168x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that meets the quality step on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.