Fronset Benchmark

Grok 4.7 at a glance

Good enough on 31/54 tasks at the Balanced step. Best value on 0 tasks. Best fit for: Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions, Infrastructure & Utility, Relevance, Classification & Matching, Social & P

Provider
xAI
Model name
grok-4.7
What the steps mean
Cost mode:
Qualifies on
31 / 54 tasks (at the Balanced step)
Best value on
0 tasks

Cost vs quality across all tasks

0%25%50%75%100%678910Quality score (6–10)Cost-efficiency vs best value (1.0 = best value)Research Query Generation — quality 7.43, 50.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMulti Perspective Decision Synthesis — quality 8.04, 20.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionMetadata Paragraph Rewriting — quality 7.84, 244.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Sequence Optimization — quality 8.20, 230.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBench Hypothesis Post Generation — quality 8.29, 250.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionAuthoritative Source Selection — quality 8.31, 4.1x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Campaign Generation — quality 7.56, 136.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEngagement Opportunity Triage — quality 8.50, 133.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublic Response Generation — quality 7.85, 208.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionTopic Cluster Labeling — quality 8.39, 207.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSocial Post Portfolio Selection — quality 8.48, 106.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCatalyst And Scenario Analysis — quality 7.97, 40.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent Set Relevance Scoring — quality 6.62, 18.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfile Pool Matching — quality 8.03, 105.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionContent To Image Prompt Generation — quality 8.80, 118.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionVoice Profile Generation — quality 9.19, 55.5x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionEvidence Grounded Claim Generation — quality 7.74, 47.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionStructured Content Summarization — quality 8.72, 48.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Section Analysis — quality 9.82, 56.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPersona Policy Eligibility Check — quality 8.46, 76.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPublication Title Package Generation — quality 9.03, 180.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReport Executive Summary Generation — quality 8.15, 30.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionProfiled Document Analysis — quality 9.17, 42.9x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionLanguage Identification — quality 9.84, 135.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionGenerated Content Relevance Scoring — quality 8.53, 54.7x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionCommunity Content Promotion Generation — quality 8.33, 4.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionPromotional Message Generation — quality 8.16, 158.4x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionBatch Text Translation — quality 8.71, 104.8x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionReference Preserving Analytical Writing — quality 9.37, 12.6x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionSection Prompt Generation — quality 8.48, 50.0x the cost of the best-value good-enough optionResearch Community Selection — quality 7.60, 15.3x the cost of the best-value good-enough option

within ~1.3× of the best-value model · 1.3–2× · >2× · ★ this model is the best-value pick on that task. Top-right = best quadrant. Only tasks where this model qualifies at the Balanced step are plotted.

Per-task breakdown

TaskCategoryQuality (% of best)ConfidenceOverpay
Authoritative Source SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching96%HIGH4.1x
Community Content Promotion GenerationSocial & Promotional Content95%MEDIUM4.3x
Reference Preserving Analytical Writing bestLong-form Content Generation100%HIGH13x
Research Community SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching97%HIGH15x
Content Set Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching97%MEDIUM19x
Multi Perspective Decision SynthesisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions91%MEDIUM20x
Report Executive Summary GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis95%HIGH31x
Catalyst And Scenario AnalysisFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions91%MEDIUM40x
Profiled Document Analysis bestFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions100%MEDIUM43x
Evidence Grounded Claim GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis91%MEDIUM48x
Structured Content SummarizationContent Summarization & Synthesis98%HIGH48x
Section Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility93%MEDIUM50x
Research Query GenerationInfrastructure & Utility94%HIGH51x
Generated Content Relevance ScoringRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM55x
Voice Profile GenerationLong-form Content Generation96%RANKED56x
Profiled Document Section Analysis bestFinancial Analysis & Trading Decisions100%RANKED56x
Persona Policy Eligibility CheckRelevance, Classification & Matching92%MEDIUM76x
Batch Text TranslationInfrastructure & Utility94%MEDIUM105x
Profile Pool MatchingRelevance, Classification & Matching92%MEDIUM106x
Social Post Portfolio SelectionRelevance, Classification & Matching97%HIGH106x
Content To Image Prompt GenerationInfrastructure & Utility99%RANKED118x
Engagement Opportunity TriageRelevance, Classification & Matching96%MEDIUM134x
Language IdentificationRelevance, Classification & Matching98%MEDIUM135x
Promotional Campaign GenerationSocial & Promotional Content94%HIGH137x
Promotional Message GenerationSocial & Promotional Content94%MEDIUM158x
Publication Title Package GenerationContent Summarization & Synthesis99%HIGH180x
Topic Cluster LabelingTopic Organization & Clustering95%HIGH208x
Public Response GenerationSocial & Promotional Content93%MEDIUM208x
Topic Sequence OptimizationTopic Organization & Clustering92%MEDIUM230x
Metadata Paragraph RewritingInfrastructure & Utility94%RANKED244x
Bench Hypothesis Post GenerationSocial & Promotional Content94%RANKED250x

Overpay — how much more you pay by running this model instead of the best-value model that meets the quality step on that task (marked ★). "16x" means you overpay 16× — the same output for 16× the best-value good-enough option; ★ means this model is that option (no overpayment). Confidence — how sure we are about the quality score (more judgments + more agreement = higher confidence): RANKED many independent judges scored this model's outputs and their agreement is very high (most confident) — HIGH many judges have scored it and they mostly agree (well-pinned) — MEDIUM enough judges have weighed in to publish, but they disagree more than we'd like (treat with a small grain of salt). LOW-confidence cells are hidden everywhere on the site. See the methodology for the exact thresholds.