Cheapest LLM that's good enough.

Snapshot 2026-10-31 · Quality step Balanced · Cost mode: batch if supported · 54 tasks · 27 models

In our busiest week we made over 180,000 calls to large-language models, and we let the outputs be evaluated by a panel of leading models. Cost per token doesn't track quality — and when you say something like "give me the most cost-effective model that's reliably nearly as good as the best one" (the Near-best step), the best-value model typically saves north of 90% of the cost.

This benchmark publishes our results so other builders can answer the same question for their own pipelines: which model(s) are good enough and the most cost-efficient for each category of tasks. The data also shows that the most expensive model — even when your budget can pay for it — is not always the best performer.

Have a look. Tell us what you think. We can also run tests for you — reach us at benchmark@fronset.ai.

What the steps mean
Cost mode:

Right-sized per step

Best-value model per capability, at your quality step. Greyed cells mean no model qualifies on that category yet.

ModelFinancial Analysis & Trading DecisionsStructured Data & Fact ExtractionContent Summarization & SynthesisLong-form Content GenerationSocial & Promotional ContentRelevance, Classification & MatchingTopic Organization & ClusteringInfrastructure & UtilityEvidence-Grounded Hypothesis GenerationQualifies on
Qwen 3.7 Plus Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)5.7x36x18x12x21x27x ★34x15x1.7x21/54
Qwen 3.8 Max Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)44x188x64x90x135x91x233x154x10x20/54
Qwen 3.8 Flash Alibaba Cloud (DashScope)—8.6x——9.1x12x———6/54
Claude Opus 5.5 Anthropic29x92x38x36x34x59x182x45x—34/54
Claude Sonnet 5.5 Anthropic17x46x16x16x15x26x82x22x—26/54
Claude Haiku 5.5 Anthropic1.0x ★1.0x ★1.0x ★1.3x1.3x ★2.1x ★3.9x2x—22/54
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek2.2x ★4.1x4.1x2.4x4.3x4.6x ★9.1x8.6x—23/54
Gemini 3.8 Flash Gemini—9.9x5.3x5.8x11x10x15x19x1.5x21/54
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Gemini——1.8x—1.3x3x—1.8x—6/54
Moonshot Kimi K3 Moonshot AI70x67x98x12x153x96x202x80x16x37/54
GPT-6 Sol OpenAI11x32x16x10x14x17x51x16x—28/54
GPT-6 Luna OpenAI1.0x ★1.9x1.5x ★1.0x ★1.0x ★2.1x ★4.3x1.3x ★—26/54
Meta Muse Spark 1.3 OpenRouter17x27x27x19x38x43x55x43x3.2x37/54
Thinking Machines Inkling OpenRouter18x2.8x67x11x ★72x75x72x41x4.7x27/54
Tencent Hy4 Preview OpenRouter32x73x57x46x134x67x37x63x10x26/54
Thinking Machines Inkling Small OpenRouter7.5x7.1x ★14x5.1x ★20x12x ★24x9.8x1.0x ★26/54
MiniMax M3 OpenRouter1.0x ★6x7.8x1.5x ★6.7x6.9x ★13x3.7x ★1.1x21/54
Tencent Hy3 OpenRouter—7.4x5.7x1.8x8.9x13x ★12x ★7.1x—15/54
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Ultra 550B OpenRouter6.4x11x—5.7x12x32x9.6x ★13x—14/54
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B OpenRouter—2.7x1.2x—4x6.8x———6/54
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B OpenRouter—————2.9x———2/54
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning OpenRouter—————6.4x———2/54
Grok 4.7 xAI40x—77x34x152x72x219x114x—31/54
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro Xiaomi MiMo1.6x2x ★2.1x1.0x ★2.8x3.4x ★4.5x2.1x—21/54
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash Xiaomi MiMo—1.0x ★1.2x ★—1.3x ★1.8x ★1.0x ★1.0x ★—17/54
GLM-5.3 Z.AI117x—241x74x403x145x327x255x—27/54
GLM-5.3 Flash Z.AI9.3x—16x8.3x10x ★12x ★24x21x—26/54
Each cell shows how much you overpay vs the best-value good-enough model in that category: best value most expensive Cells show how much you overpay vs the best-value model clearing the bar (1.0x = this model is the best-value good-enough option, no overpayment; 3.2x = you pay ~3× more on average for the same quality). ★ marks any model that is the best-value pick on at least one of the category's tasks (multiple stars per column are possible — they're the per-task cost winners). Greyed cells: model doesn't qualify on any task in that category at the current step. Rows grouped by provider; click a model name for the full per-task breakdown.

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

By capability

Financial Analysis & Trading Decisions

Read business/financial docs deeply enough to make forward-looking judgments about opportunity and risk.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
MiniMax M3 ★1/4$0.75best value
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★1/3$1.03best value
GPT-6 Luna ★2/3$1.27best value
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ★3/4$3.532.2x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro1/4$7.761.6x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 19 qualifying models →

Structured Data & Fact Extraction

Precise pattern recognition and field-level information retrieval, strict schema adherence.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★1/3$0.34best value
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★1/3$0.74best value
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B1/1$0.932.7x
GPT-6 Luna2/3$1.411.9x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro ★2/3$1.482x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 21 qualifying models →

Content Summarization & Synthesis

Compress long input into essential nuggets without losing material detail.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★2/3$0.571.2x
GPT-6 Luna ★4/4$2.221.5x
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★2/4$2.33best value
MiniMax M32/3$3.057.8x
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash3/4$3.214.1x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 23 qualifying models →

Long-form Content Generation

Sustained compositional skill, voice consistency, coherent extended prose.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
GPT-6 Luna ★2/3$0.71best value
Claude Haiku 5.52/3$0.911.3x
MiniMax M3 ★3/3$1.051.5x
Tencent Hy31/3$1.311.8x
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1/2$1.652.4x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 21 qualifying models →

Social & Promotional Content

Conciseness, platform-native conventions, engagement under tight character limits.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
GPT-6 Luna ★2/3$0.33best value
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★2/4$0.341.3x
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite1/4$0.491.3x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro2/2$0.712.8x
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★4/4$0.751.3x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 25 qualifying models →

Relevance, Classification & Matching

Semantic similarity judgment: does this thing belong in that bucket / match that target?

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite3/9$0.233x
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B2/6$0.232.9x
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning2/7$0.666.4x
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B3/9$0.716.8x
Claude Haiku 5.5 ★8/14$0.752.1x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 27 qualifying models →

Topic Organization & Clustering

Discover natural groupings without external schema, name and order them coherently.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★2/2$0.21best value
Claude Haiku 5.51/3$0.733.9x
GPT-6 Luna1/2$0.804.3x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro1/2$1.104.5x
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash1/3$1.699.1x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 22 qualifying models →

Infrastructure & Utility

Mechanical competence at format conversion, metadata manipulation, prompt rewriting, translation; minimal domain expertise required.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash ★3/6$0.12best value
Claude Haiku 5.53/4$0.232x
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite1/6$0.591.8x
GPT-6 Luna ★7/7$0.601.3x
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro4/5$0.602.1x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 23 qualifying models →

Evidence-Grounded Hypothesis Generation

Derive distinct, arguable hypotheses or claims from a source document while grounding and citing each one strictly in a supplied set of approved evidence.

ModelTasksAvg $/1k runsOverpay
Thinking Machines Inkling Small ★1/1$4.91best value
MiniMax M31/1$5.391.1x
Gemini 3.8 Flash1/1$7.541.5x
Qwen 3.7 Plus1/1$8.201.7x
Meta Muse Spark 1.31/1$15.733.2x

Fronset Benchmark · snapshot 2026-10-31 · Balanced step

See all 9 qualifying models →

Methodology, briefly

Quality scores come from LLM-judge verdicts on production workloads, on a 0–10 scale. Only MEDIUM-or-better cells qualify. Each quality step sets the bar at a share of the best-performing model's score on each task — move the slider above to see your own pipeline. The methodology lists the six steps.

Full methodology →

What changed this week

What changed — 2026-10-16 → 2026-10-31

  • Tasks: 54 · Models: 27 · Model–task pairs: 929 (+23) · Graded samples: 49,974 (+3,263)
Per-model movement

(every model, Balanced step) — best value = tasks where the model is the cheapest good-enough option, counted separately under each cost mode; qualifying = tasks it’s good-enough on (quality only, so it is the same under both modes). A model with no batch API prices batch at its sync rate, so the two best-value columns diverge wherever a provider batch discount decides the winner:

ModelBest Value (Sync)Best Value (Async/Batch)Qualifying
GPT-6 Luna17 (+5)13 (-2)26 (+2)
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Flash11 (-2)13 (-1)17 (+1)
MiniMax M36 (-1)521 (-2)
Claude Haiku 5.52 (-2)6 (+2)22 (+5)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash52 (-3)23 (+5)
Thinking Machines Inkling Small4 (+1)4 (+1)26 (-1)
GLM-5.3 Flash3326 (-1)
Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro1 (+1)3 (+3)21 (+1)
Tencent Hy322 (+1)15 (-1)
Thinking Machines Inkling1127 (-2)
Qwen 3.7 Plus1 (-2)1 (-2)21 (-2)
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Ultra 550B1 (+1)1 (+1)14 (+2)
Meta Muse Spark 1.30037 (+3)
Moonshot Kimi K30037
Claude Opus 5.50034 (+1)
Grok 4.70031 (+2)
GPT-6 Sol0028
GLM-5.30027
Claude Sonnet 5.50026 (+2)
Tencent Hy4 Preview0026 (-1)
Gemini 3.8 Flash0021 (-3)
Qwen 3.8 Max0020
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite006 (-1)
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Super 120B0 (-1)06
Qwen 3.8 Flash006 (+1)
NVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Lightning002
NVIDIA Nemotron-3 Nano 30B-A3B002

Full changelog →